The students and faculty of the Architecture and Interior Design programs housed within the School of Architecture + Planning housed within the Klesse College of Engineering and Integrated Design exist and thrive within a studio and learning culture specific to our shared creative work. Our aim is to:
From the undergraduate course catalog.
The design studio sequence in the first and second years of study, for both architecture and interior design students, are structured as laboratories in order to encourage an engaged and exploratory studio culture. The learning environment of the design studio actively promotes and supports the progressive development of design thinking and making through iterative design practices, discourse, and critical thinking skills. Throughout the sequence, direct engagement with the means, materials, and methods of design serves as a basis for increasingly more abstract and complex design operations. These courses combine graphic, modeling, digital and verbal visualization techniques and skills in 2D and 3D space across multiple mediums and scales. The design laboratory studio sequence supports the incremental development of student’s creative and critical thinking practices. These practices address design in the various contexts and scales of human experience, encompassing hand and body, building and structure, room and street, as well as city and context.
The advanced studio sequence in the third and fourth years of study engages students in the wider and more detailed field of architectural inquiry and the complexity of the design process. The teaching-learning environment of the design studio fosters dialog and discovery through collaboration, individual inquiry + production, and critical discourse. Design decisions are set within, and influenced by, a larger cultural and natural perspective as well as an evolving architectural discourse or polemic. Design, in this context, brings a diversity of resources, voices, and allied disciplines to the table while addressing the potential and design of human environments. Design projects explore a variety of issues and programs including the differences and tensions between the local and global, the cultural and natural, the urban and exurban, as well as between the technical and philosophical. Throughout the advanced studio sequence, students are progressively challenged to employ creative design thinking, further refining their own design processes and critical inquiries while producing increasingly sophisticated presentations of building design concepts and proposals.
The professional studio sequence in the fifth and sixth years––leading to our professional accredited MArch2 degree––engages students in a focused study of building assembly and technology as they direct and inform architectural inquiry and the design process. The teaching-learning environment of the design studio fosters individual inquiry + collective discourse. Throughout the professional studio sequence, students are progressively challenged to employ critical design thinking and iterative development throughout all phases of a building design project from conceptual and precedent studies through design development and production documentation. Individual inquiry and design process is informed by the growing understanding of building systems and assemblies, as well as building technology and design theory. Students produce increasingly technical solutions and sophisticated presentations of building design systems and assemblies as they are informed by design thinking and methodologies.
As students move into fully interiors-focused design studios in their third and fourth years, prior investigations are built upon–they are not lost. The teaching-learning environment of the design studio fosters dialog and discovery through collaboration, individual inquiry + production, and critical discourse. Interior spaces are shaped by multiple forces; how they function is critical. Evidence-based design, case-study analysis, and building systems + codes are all facets of a comprehensive design solution. Design projects explore a variety of user groups with specific programming needs, both commercial and residential, as well as contexts in which they occur. Communication is critical to student success; students are expected to develop thoughtful concepts and to share their ‘story’ as part of presenting their design proposal. Throughout the advanced studio sequence, students are progressively challenged to employ creative design thinking, further refining their own design processes and critical inquiries while producing increasingly sophisticated presentations of design proposals.
The studio is understood as being a course of study, a cabinet of wonder, a community, and an ecosystem. We believe that it is a place of critical encounter where a diversity of voices and allied disciplines are brought to the table, considered, and productively engaged. It fosters collaboration as well as individual inquiry and production, broadens students’ awareness of the interconnections between things, stirs the imagination, and supports creative inquiry, critical thinking, and reflective discourse. The studio is both a place of work and dialogue. Lectures, presentations, discussions and reviews should enhance the learning environment while being balanced with adequate time for productive work.
The artifact––whether the product of students’ investigations (things, models, and representations) or supporting faculty-led discussions (examples, presentations, references)––is the center and focus of the studio environment. Artifacts are understood to ground discourse, to provoke thought, and to offer connections or lessons. Collected artifacts support students’ ability to think conceptually, form conjectures, and find inspiration. Together, they support the notion of the studio as a cabinet of wonder.
The following tenets are established to help all to grow, learn, and strive for excellence through our collective efforts within the UTSA Architecture and Interior Design Programs:
All students are encouraged to initiate and foster a life-long learning process and to establish a trajectory of investigations that will sustain a continuing creative life within the profession.
Students and the faculty share a responsibility to contribute to making the studio an environment that is respectful of their development, participating in the intellectual life of the school, and being conducive to a focused creative and critical practice.
Studio is a collaborative teaching and learning environment in which multiple facets of culture, science, technology, practice, and learning are brought into discourse with one another.
The most valuable insights emerge from an ongoing and iterative dialogue with the work, not from the judgment of the finished project. The students' ongoing design work is the center of studio discussion. Each discussion is never intended as personal criticism, but as a constructive critique and mutual dialogue about architecture.
Students are also expected to engage the intellectual and experiential opportunities offered within the program, university, city, region, and globe. Design is best understood in person and ideas are best developed and honed by discourse, learning, and desire.
All student work has the capacity to rise to a level of excellence such that it could influence the dynamic and evolving discipline of architecture and design.
All dialog and discovery, creative production and critique, inquiry and critical analysis is founded on mutual respect. Respect is an ethical position which governs the relationship between students, between students and teachers, and between students, teachers, and the studio itself.
Students and faculty are expected to attend all classes, be on time, stay in class, and be diligent about completing work outside of class. Reading, learning, and exploring ideas outside of class is essential. Participation in studio is about self-development, which is best supported by time with your colleagues and instructors and not with friends and family via phones or other electronic devices. Such devices are expected to foster learning in the studio and classroom, not hinder it.
All stages of the design process require the ability to think clearly, critically, and coherently, to make persuasive arguments and sensible judgments. Values are established through the iterative processes of making multiples—each of which is a conjecture that holds a lesson and suggests a possible solution—rather than focusing on a singular solution or answer. Student production should include drawing, modeling, representing, discussing, reading, and writing. Students are encouraged to explore their own evolving design process through iterative studies, inquiry, and production.
While each faculty member carefully establishes the requirements of the assignments/projects given, these assignments in return challenge each student to learn how to time manage their own work efforts in order to investigate the inherent complexities of each project.
Students should develop a sense of self-reliance, resourcefulness, intellectual rigor, and independence, to discipline their working habits, to give full attention to the quality and craft of their work, and to adapt to different studio environments. All should maintain an open attitude to diverse viewpoints, constructive criticism, and advice of other students and faculty.
Particular to our situation as a commuter campus, students and faculty should be sensitive to dependence on commuting to and from campus, particularly its impact on timeliness and ability to work late in studio. Obligations to studio work, assignments, attendance, and timeliness remain priorities, so impacts should be rare and the effects mitigated responsively and responsibly.
Students are encouraged to think of all faculty at the school as "their" faculty and not only their particular studio instructor. Interaction is encouraged between students in all studios and all years of the program. Students should strive to learn from as many faculty as possible during their studies.
It is important that the Studio Culture Policy be subject to continual renewal, critique, and revision. These policies should be reviewed bi-annually.
Offering degrees and certificates in engineering, architecture, construction science and management, historic preservation, interior design, and urban and regional planning at undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral levels
Undergraduate Majors
Master's Degrees
Doctoral Degrees
Certificate Programs